Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Well, I do not really understand the fix to 1808 anyway, but if the > idea was right, this patch is the right way to do it.
before that fix, we checked for cell.size(), which was too lose, because two different cells might have the same size (which was the case in bug 1808), and the idea of the fix was just a stricter test (too strict, as we have seen now). I think checking if we are in the same paragraph is indeed the way to go. > So go ahead. > > BTW, in doRecordUndo there seems to be a problem with the indentation > of the test (look at the patch). Yes, I will unify the indendation there. Jürgen
