>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As far as I can see, the only difference is whether insets will >> close again when one leaves the insets. So the difference is an >> enhancement. Juergen> Partly. As said, in case of s&r, we already close, so we have Juergen> a regression with your patch, an enhancement with Alfredo's. Sorry, I actually did not realize that we did that. Juergen> This looks suspicious indeed. I don't really know why it is Juergen> like it is (there might be reasons). Anyway, if you'd like me Juergen> to change the order in that function, I can do that. Yes, please. Juergen> That does not particularly disqualify my approach, no? Did I write that? I meant to say that your patch is OK with me, except that I would like this particular bit of code (which is not yours) fixed. JMarc