Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: // This is correct and always > Juergen> safe. // (See Meyer's Effective STL, Item 28.) return > Juergen> (++rit).base(); >>> Isn't it possible to fix this instead? I agree that the code is >>> not very clear... > > Juergen> I cannot fix it, because I don't understand it (and I > Juergen> certainly don't own Meyer's book). > > You are in the same situation as me, then. > > Could a reverse_iterator guru take a quick look? It has to be > trivial.
Hmmm. I've got the book... Item 28: Understand how to use a reverse_iterator's base iterator. I'll get back to you. -- Angus
