On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 11:23 +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > This explanation crossed my mind too, but can it be true? You only need > > access to paste_tabular, which is a pointer. And isn't it global anyway? > > You have only one tabular paste buffer for all of LyX. What about moving > > this over to CutAndPaste? > > > > Wondering. > > Please come up with a patch, I you find the time (I don't, unfortunately). > > Jürgen
Not worth spending the time, I think. I verified that your patch does what it is supposed to. For 1.5, we should implement André's approach. BTW "Paste Recent" only keeps a stack of *text* cuts, not tabular cuts. WONTFIX, I suppose, for 1.4. Lars, can Jürgen's patch go in? - Martin BTW I have my patch for 1765 also still sitting in my tree, untested and uncommitted, quoth Jürgen: "Reopening, because the representation is still broken for multicolumn pwidth cells (also when a non-multicolumn pwidth cell is changed to a non-pwidth multicolumn cell, the width is not reset), ..."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
