On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:22:15PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Now I am wondering. One big advantage of your patch is that it allows > to mark individual table cells as deleted. This _requires_ to have the > erased_ inset member, I guess.
Why do we ever want that? I don't think it makes sense as a user interface. Are you thinking of expanding this for future support or add/delete row/col ? regards john
