G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On 30.06.05, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > Georg Baum <Georg.Baum <at> ...> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > This works, but I get all frames in ERT, not exactly what expected.
>
> This is because beamer layout file doesnot have a Style with latexname
> "frame".
>
> Instead, it introduces the \lyxframe and \lyxframeend commands as an
> substitution for nesting stuff inside a frame.
Georg patch translates
\frame{ ... }
as
<ert>\frame{</ert>...<ert>}</ert>
which is all right from the point of view of tex2lyx current goal.
My previous follow-up raised the question of directly translating in the
required layout by associating a latex construct to the corresponding
layout equivalent, and using a (possibly user written) syntax file
to define these equivalences.
Postfiltering the lyx file is of course possible, replacing
current ERTs with the layout commands in LyX code, so this
is a really aesthetic question from the point of view of tex2lyx.
--
Jean-Pierre
