Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > My point is that the behaviour of getInsetByCode is intended and > > should be left alone. > > OK, then the comment to the function is at least misleading. How about the > following (I know that it is not exactly what you are looking for, but I do > not see the need in changing gotoInset now).
What about this patch? Jürgen
