Uwe Stöhr wrote:

> Hello Angus and volunteer installer testers,
> I just uploaded an improved version of the installer to:
> http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/

Woo! You've been busy!

Uwe, why don't you get Lars to give you CVS write access to 
development/Win32/packaging ? That way you can merge your version into the 
'official' one.

I've been thinking over Asger's suggestion on how best to present all 
these packages. Given that the first thing we do is interrogate the 
Registry for their presence, we should be able to produce a first page 
something like:

=========================================================================
Tools used by LyX

LyX makes use of many other utilities. Some are required absolutely. Some 
will add functionality. Please check the boxes for those tools you'd like 
to play with more (wording to be 'improved' ;-))
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

[x] A unix shell  J:\MinSYS\bin\sh.exe
[]  Python        J:\Python24\python.exe
.
.
.
[]  ImageMagick   J:\Program Files\ImageMagick-Q16\convert.exe

=========================================================================

The idea being that only those pages that are [x]-ed will be shown as the 
user moves through the pages of the installer. If the installer finds a 
package, then that page will be unchecked, although you can always [x] it 
manually.

Thereafter, the Unix shell page would be something like:

=========================================================================
Unix shell

LyX needs a unix shell environment to run a number of important scripts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

[x] Use MinSYS
[]  Use Cygwin
[]  Install LyX's minimal shell environment

[]  Download MinSYS
[]  Download Cygwin

[ J:\MinSYS\bin\sh.exe ] [...]

=========================================================================

What do you think?

-- 
Angus

Reply via email to