On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:49, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:56:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > | I have the feeling that pruning repeat key events is not wrong in > > | principle, but at best not needed. Without it, you know precisely > > | (under my scheme) that keeping the PgDown key down for 0.5 secs will get > > | you 10 screens lower, only a few of which will actually be displayed due > > | to the X coalescing behaviour. > > > > Do you want that? To not know exactly that when you release the button > > scrolling stops. I just hate it when the cursor or screen continue to > > move after key release. > > How "asynchrounous" is Martin's approach, i.e. how long will LyX be busy > after a user released PageDown?
The time it takes to render one screen (or slightly over). I see no large backlogs. - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
