On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:22:14AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:44:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > could actually drop with Qt 4 MVC. What bits become unnecessary? > > > > Qt 4 uses MVC for e.g. tree views, list views, tables, comboboxes... > > > > I don't think LyX structure will be affected. However, in addition to > > Then would we really have much to gain in terms of maintenance?
By switching to Qt4? Probably nothing. And an early switch will probably be a major pain as long as the major distributions don't switch as well. > Maybe in a few years it would make sense, when qt4 is everywhere. That's what I think, too. > > *shrug* There is some slot-auto-connect feature which might help a bit, > > but I haven't used it until now. I am fighting the abysmal drawing speed > > right now. Two mallocs, three reallocs and two frees for drawing a > > single (already properly clipped etc) triangle.. > > Ouch. I've been promised improvements in this area for Qt 4.0.1. Note the '1'. Andre' --
