Hossein Noorikhah wrote: > Hi > I don't know much about ISO-10646-1, I think it's somehow like unicode, > but is developed by ISO;
Here's a mail by a real guru that goes someway to explaining the differences: http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-mule/199906/msg00023.html > So I want to edit src/encoding.C file, and I > want to know what are those constants used for the shapes of the arabic > alphabets, as you can find in arabic_table, and arabic_table2. > If you know something, please help me. I couldn't find out what's > happenning. I also tried to find some kind of table, for that, but I > couldn't. If they were unicode constants, I could find them; But they are > not, becuase they would be 2-byte, not 1-byte constants. Yes, I'm afraid that all characters must fit into a single byte in LyX at the moment. That's why we have the horrid mess of local code pages, ISO 8859, cp1256, etc. So, I'm afraid, ISO-10646-1 won't work in LyX ATM. > Thanks. -- Angus
