>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>>> I have to admit that the length of this patch makes me nervous. >>>> Isn't it possible to devise a `just good enough' solution that >>>> could go in 1.3.6? >> Angus> Sure. Describe what you would like to see. >> I do not know precisely... Could we get away without the nifty >> validators, so that the result is not as good as 1.4.x, but better >> than 1.3.5? Angus> In that case, we should leave the code almost as it is now, but Angus> make the loop in the browser code understand Angus> \tex_allows_spaces. I think I'd prefer that, if it is possible and not too complicated. Basically I just want to allow people to work with paths with spaces transparently in cases where it is possible. JMarc
