Georg Baum wrote: > >> What does it do with the contents of such charstyles? Transform it to > >> containing layout? Also, shouldn't the warning be the same as for > >> missing layouts? (cf. the recent discussion on bug 1591). > > IMO it should be transformed to standard layout with a warning (as it is > for layouts right now). Of course, loss of charstyles is still better than > a crash ;-)
"standard layout" means containing layout? Think of charstyle insets within quotations etc. Jürgen
