Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It seems to me that LyX 1.3.6 has enough changes in it to be worth > releasing. > > What remains to be done? I can think of: > > - windows support: Angus still has a some code he wants to implement > (related to forking?)
I'll try and get my arse in gear on this one, but really I don't think that this should delay any release. The fact that Windows becomes an officially supported platform is a much bigger deal IMO. Before we release the code as 1.3.6, however, I think it would make sense to have some Windows guinea pigs to try it out and report on any obvious problems. Maybe a "call for Windows testers" mail to the lyx-users list? > - windows support: when loading a file in LyX through the explorer, > some action like viewing PDF subsequently fail. This is due to a > missing os::internal_path invocation on file names passed from the > command line. This is easy to do, but I'd prefer to see it done by > someone who actually compiles the windows/mingw version. I'll have a go tomorrow. -- Angus
