Andre Poenitz wrote: > So a good check is always math-in-math-in-note-in-table-in-table. If > something works in this scenario it is fairly safe to assume it works > everywhere.
This works too. Jürgen
Andre Poenitz wrote: > So a good check is always math-in-math-in-note-in-table-in-table. If > something works in this scenario it is fairly safe to assume it works > everywhere.
This works too. Jürgen