Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> + // Redefine the par reference because modification of >> + // the cursor has invalidated the original. >> + Paragraph const & par = cur.paragraph();
> Ok, I'll apply that.
> Alfredo
Aren't these things frustrating though!
Is it expensive to access things like
Paragraph & par = cur.paragraph();
pit_type pit = cur.pit();
If not, then it would be bast to just remove the short cuts, no?
--
Angus
