Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So I'd stick with the GPL in large and only put single files under another
| licence. If a copyright holder insists that his/her changes to an existing
| GPL'd file shall fall under a different licence, they have to be convinced
| that this is not possible (I'm not sure if GPL would alow this!)
>
| Conclusion:
| If anyone wants to have their contribution under a different licence, they
| have to provide this contribution in an isolated file.
Note that the file would have to be freestanding as well and not build
upon any other LyX code, because then it is GPL automatically. And if
that is unacceptable for the author then we cannot allow the
patch/file.
--
Lgb
