Andreas Vox wrote:
> I think the
>
> void method() {
> if (in_method) return;
> in_method = true;
> // do something
> in_method = false;
> }
>
> pattern is quite simple and safe. It just protects the method against
> involuntary indirect recursive calls.I agree entirely (in case I didn't make that clear in my earlier mail). I'm just asking you to make this safe for multiple instances of Dialogs. Ie, make 'in_method' a member of the Dialogs class. -- Angus
