Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sunday 30 January 2005 16:20, Andreas Vox wrote:
> > Hi Angus, Hi JosÃ!
> >
> > -- I guess this is for you!
>
> Hi,
> I don't have much time now, as soon as I get some time I will review
> the
> patch?
That's fine.
>
> Just to simplify my work what are your doubts regarding the docbook
> part?
Options:
a) using entities for filenames or not (cf. graphicsinset)
b) putting image files in a subdirectory or not, what name to use for the
subdirectory
c) How to align math bitmaps vertically. It's no problem to get ascent/descent
from preview.sty, but how to code it in XML?
Docbook defines valign=(top|center|bottom) which is not good enough,
XHTML apparently also knows "valign=-7px"
d) What file formats should we produce? All, just PNG, just EPS or PNG+EPS ?
e) Should we use Chris' <!ENTITY % output.print.png "IGNORE"> everywhere,
just SGML or not at all?
f) Are these decisions the same for SGML and XML?
g) What "density" or magnification should be used for maths?
(Not knowing the final font size)
My ideas:
a) Do it consistently, maybe drop the entities if noone protests
b) Yes, something like myFile_images/
c) Produce illegal valign attributes which can be used directly for XHTML
d) EPS + PNG, let other tools do the rest
e) Only for EPS + PNG
f) Yes
g) No idea. That's the advantage of EPS images, they are scalable...
>
> PS: Have you seen that it is possible for docbook 5.0 to be release
> without
> a dtd? More and more xml is becoming the default.
>
Haven't looked at DB 5.0 yet and don't understand your statement. There will be
_no_ DTD for DB 5.0? Something instead, like schema or relax NG?
Ciao
/Andreas
