Angus Leeming wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> All insets, not only top-level (but you probably meant that). > > Ahh yes, you're right. However, note that the code *use to* iterate over > all insets with the proviso that the entire contents of a math inset were > treated as a single whole. That is, all those bit-of-math insets weren't > really insets at all. The real inset was an InsetFormula that could contan > only bit-of-math insets. > > I have no idea if that logic is still correct. Are the bit-of-math insets > proper insets now?
Yes, they are. But I think that the point is that only the 'host' math inset (mathhullinset) has a non-trivial addPreview. Alfredo
