Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Does your compiler allow:
>> class Base {
>> public:
>> virtual Base * clone();
>> };
>> class Derived : public Base {
>> public:
>> virtual Base * clone() {
>> return new Derived;
>> }
>> };
>> ?? (what about if we add some template classes?)
>
| I haven't tried, since I ran out of time.
>
| For those that are interested, attached is an archive of my changes so
| far. Apply the patch, put os_win32.h in src/support and the rest of
| the new files in development/win32.
>
| I'd like to commit the struct<->class, and->&& and #include fixes,
| since those are uncontroversial and improve correctness for all
| platforms.
Several of the struxtg<->class changes should be fixed by changing the
definition instead. We should reserve the "struct" for old-C POD style
structs.
The and -> && is a good change, but if it is required, then your
compiler is buggy.
the include changes might be good, would have been interesting to see
some of the errors.
The #warning wrapping is ok.
--
Lgb
