Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Well, I understand your point of view, but I envisioned package as the > place where all the #ifdef USE_PACKAGE_foo live. The main code does > not have to know that macos packaging like to search for binaries in > its bundle.
I prefer one way and you prefer the other. Solution? Go to the cinema! That's what I'm going to do, anyway. See ya! >>> Maybe because putenv is posix, and setenv is not? > > Angus> So what if setenv is BSD. If it's better and I have it, I > Angus> should use it, no? > > Yes, I was not disagreeing with you, just trying to find an answer. Ok. Then I suggest the #if defined (HAVE_SETENV) #elif defined (HAVE_PUTENV) #else #endif way. Are you happy for this patch to go in or should we thrash out the "location, location, location" stuff first? -- Angus
