Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>> Ruurd has changed the invocation of system() under DOS to:
>>>> system("start /min <command>");
>>>> from
>>>> system("start /min/n <command>");
>>>>
>>>> Ruurd, what's the reason for this? Is it just a typo in the original
>>>> code?
>>>
>>> The /n came from the OS/2 port. Makes no sense on Windows...
>>
> | Fine. Then I'll commit it.
>
> Is the OS/2 port completely dead now?
Well no one is actively maintaining it, but Ruurd's put some effort into
abstracting much of the code into os_os2.C. I don't think it hurts much to
have the few remaining __EMX__ defines.
--
Angus
