Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Lars> Like this perhaps:
>>
>> + int foo = (forba() == hans ? some1() : some2());
>> + -NOT-
>> + int foo = forba() == hans ? some1() : some2();
>>
>> I would think that
>> + int foo = (forba() == hans) ? some1() : some2();
>> is clearer in this case. Is it just me?
>
| Nope. I often write:
| int const foo = (a == b) ?
| case1 :
| case2;
And I don't like this very much :-)
But it really depends on how complex your case1 and case 2 are.
| I think that parentheses around the whole lot will just lead to confusion.
It depends. You have to use your best jugement.
--
Lgb
