Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| But note that there is more code inside that if block, so you cannot remove
| the "if". And
>
| if (d <= best_dist) {
| best_dist = min(best_dist, d);
| ...
>
| does look silly (to me).
sure.
>
>> | If I read such code I always mentally translate it to the other version.
>> | So at least for me this is certainly less readable.
>>
>> I am the opposite end.
>> And especially this last one where you can keep w const and initialize
>> once.
>
| I agree with Lars here. (still, I think that there are more interesting
| things to do than to discuss these details ;-)
"The Devil is in the details."
--
Lgb
