On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Well, the real type is idx_type, so I think it is better than size_t. > > I think that the places that use size_t do that to avoid pulling a big > > header. > > This has turned out as a can of worms for me. I get tons of error messages > which I do not understand. So I'd appreciate some help (maybe from someone > who builds on a 64bit System). Please feel free to do the relevant int -> > idx_type changes.
size_t instead of CursorSlice::idx_type is just fine. Alternately, we could have some typedef for idx_type in InsetBase and use this. Using CursorSlice::idx_type is not wrong, but simply too verbose for my taste. > Furthermore, there is some compatibility code in tabular.C (1294ff). > Georg/José, shouldn't this be handled by lyx2lyx? Probably. I doubt this code has been used during the last three years... Andre'
