On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 08:50:52AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I think I saw some code similar to > > > > void foo(LyXLength len); > > > > This should be > > > > void foo(LyXLength const & len); > > Corrected in the attached patch. I will commit this if I hear no more > objections.
'foo(LyXLength())' is fine if the function is declared as
void foo(LyXLength const & len);'
There is no need to write this as
LyXLength len;
foo(len);
Andre'
