On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 12:10:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So, we have two different definitions of what a word is, one being by > inclusion and the other by exclusion. I am not sure what is the best > way to define a word. Note that the isp_esc_char stuff should move to > ControlSpellchecker. Then we would be in postion to unify these two > definitions of a word. But how should we do it?
I think it doesn't matter much how it is done as long as it is done uniformly. If in doubt I'd prefer the 'inclusion' method, but that's most likely a personal preference about which I don't care too much. Andre'
