>>>>> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But, cursorLeftOneWord requires a word, doesn't it? Alfredo> I don't quite get the sense in that phrase. Do you meant Alfredo> "LCursor" intead of "word" ? Yes :) >> An alternative way of doing it would be not to use >> cursorLeftOneWord at all, but do the move to the left 'by hand'. >> Would you prefer that? Alfredo> Ah, I see (if the above is true). I think that probably the Alfredo> cleanest way would be to have the word "identifier" functions Alfredo> to operate at the slice level, and have cursorLeftOneWord and Alfredo> getWord to to use them independently (and build/modify the Alfredo> appropriate deep cursor). But of course, it may me just a Alfredo> matter of taste. I'd apply what you have and leave the Alfredo> "political" bussiness for later. OK, I'll do that then. Alfredo> One think I don't like so much in the current way of going is Alfredo> that some LyXText methods use deep cursors but just operate Alfredo> on a slice they "own", and this is pretty much error prone. Yes, and very confusing. Alfredo> It may make sense at some point to have LyXText methods to Alfredo> just use slices, and move all "deep" methods out of LyXText Alfredo> (lyxtext_funcs again or else). Alfredo> I think that the thing needs some discussion. Hopefully on Alfredo> the LDM? Yes, hopefully. JMarc
