>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> It seems reasonable. Note that the current font is typically a part >> of the 'context'. Why not put the font parameter in there? Georg> I forgot why I did it like that (it is some time ago when I Georg> wrote that). I'll try your suggestion. Yes, if it not too complicated. >> Actually, I wonder whether using LyX original LyXFont class a bit >> more (with it enum) would not be much simpler than reproducing all >> the syntax strings it uses. I think the logic of the code would >> improve. Georg> This was my first thought, too, but it is not easy: Using the Georg> original LyXFont is not possible, because it has a lot of Georg> dependencies. That means one would need to reproduce the needed Georg> code in the tex2lyx LyXFont class anyway (or factor it out in a Georg> common base class). This would be nice, but it is indeed more work. Georg> Since LyXFont has also font family names like "error1", and I Georg> don't want to parse \error1 as a font family, I thought it is Georg> easyer to create a tex2lyx specific font struct and name tables Georg> with just the needed information. I see. JMarc
