>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I'm not saying that the regexes are wrong, but I'm not so sure Angus> that they say what you say they say or that they do the job Angus> very well. Below are some statements saying in words what the Angus> regexes actually do say. Well, I did not change the regexps from what they do. The comment above them is not supposed to describe them precisely (they describe themselves fairly well), but to give an idea of what kind of log content they can match. Angus> Presumably, the first two patterns of the regex clean up any Angus> crud left over from last time? Yes. Angus> Why is the last grouping a grouping and, if you're interested Angus> in matching '[ )]*', why not match that instead of '.*', all of Angus> which, except ' )' is caught by the previous pattern? The last grouping is here to keep the remainder of the line, which will be parsed in the next round. Angus> Once again, I don't think that the comment matches the regex. Angus> Which one is meant to be correct. I'm not sure. Again, I do not think that the behaviour of the regexps is worse than what it used to be :) JMarc
