Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:02:05PM +0100, John Levon wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 11:34:43PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> >> > Well, if this would be done, I could live with it. Until then I'd >> > prefer a visible mini-buffer. Makes debugging a bit easier. >> >> We could probably enable it by default for development versions or >> something > | I certainly wouldn't mind...
Is the argument for not having it visible always, valid?
--
Lgb
