Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:42:30PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >>> btw, we should have a right past-the-end position for dociterator >>> (and all derivatives). >> >> We do. >> >> It's an empty cursor slice stack. (which is, btw, different from >> the last possible cursor position, i.e. really one ++ after this). >> >> You get this thing by using the default constructor. > > I know. But this is not good enough, because it doesn't allow > pit = end();
If that's (pit == end()), then try (!pit) If it really is (pit = end()), then try (pit = paragraph_iterator()) > --pit; Why can't you add the appropriate operator? > Alfredo -- Angus
