John Levon wrote:
> I really had thought I'd described the exact issue *several* times, *in
> detail*, and said what I thought should be done, and even started coding
> it.
Good for you. Well as I've started fixing drawing problems only a short time
ago, I've probably missed it at that time. But you really expect me to
remember your random solution to a random bug?
> Please check the archives ... can't believe we're still going round and
> round on this one :(
I can assure you it's the first time I am trying to look at the problem. So
it's certainly not me that is going round and round.
btw, your solution seems to be to pass w - x_position_of_inset as maxwidth
(is it?).
I find it bogus. It can end up with an output like:
<------------- w ------------>
ablah bblaj blah [ert]
+-----+
| this|
| is |
| ridi|
| coul|
| ous.|
+-----+
balh blah blah.
I think I almost prefer the current behaviour.
Alfredo
