On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:59:09PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:27:38PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > Hmm, a concrete case though: if a document is readonly, the checkboxen > > > (?) should be present but disabled. > > > > Which ones? > > > > [Nevertheless, any place that has the power to modify a document (say > > an LFUN_SELFINSERT handler also has the power to lookup the document's > > readonly flag. So the corresponding getStatus (which has the same > > information available as the lfun handler itself) function has this > > knowledge, too. I don't think this is one of the corner cases...] > o > I did a lot of work to centralise the handling of readonly lfuns vs. > mutating ones. It simplified a lot and fixed a lot of bugs. > > Please only introduce read-only tests in other places if you *have* to
I wasn't even thinking about this, but Jean-Marc came up with this example. As far as I can tell the read-only tests do fine right noiw. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
