Andre Poenitz wrote:

>> $ cat redirect.sh
>> #! /bin/sh
>> exec $1 > $2
>> 
>> 
>> \converter tiff eps "sh $$s/redirect.sh('tiff2ps $$i' $$o)" ""
> 
> That's as insecure as the original solution, isn't it?

It doesn't seem so...

for instance a && in $1 or $2 won't be interpreted if I'm not mistaken. But
as I've said, I'm no expert.

Alfredo


Reply via email to