On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:56:29PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > | I think it'll be a bit too "omständigt" to define command-sequences
> > | in 
> > 
> > "omstendig" -> circumstantial, detailed  (long-winded)
> 
> "umständlich"
> 
> I found it quite readable, but now I see why people insist on getting
> that spellcheck-on-the-fly thingy...

Actually, I couldn't think of a good word in English so I just used the 
Swedish word ...  (I knew Lars would understand at least :-)

/Christian

-- 
Christian Ridderström                           http://www.md.kth.se/~chr


Reply via email to