Re: Comparing Named Functor, bind and lambda

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:

| | IMO there is a draw between 'old fashioned code' and lambda. If one
| | needs to decide for one or the other, other criteria are needed.
| | 'simple standard constructs' would be one of them.
>
| so bind(&Foo::name, _1, name)

This was not the example I wanted to give, since this one requires a
equal_to and nested binds.

What I wanted was:

     bind(prefixIs, _1, name)

(instead of using bind2nd or a manually created functor.)

-- 
        Lgb