Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >>> | No it's not. If the data is passed as a string then we allow the >>> | outside world to receive the data, modify it and post it back >>> | with no addditional effort to us. >>> >>> this is the exception (external data), for all internal stuff >>> serialization _and_ the mailer stuff are really overkill. >> > | Shrug. There was a simple scheme that worked in 1.3.x where the > | frontends stored the inset. Which you didn't like. Now you have a > | safe scheme that you think is too complex. Yet I would argue it is > | clean and simple and extensible. >> > | Come up with a working alternative and we'll discuss that ;-) > > Simple: forget about the externals for a second.
No. > Pass the whole InsetParamsXXX in a boost::any to where it is used. > The sender and the receiver knows the type so now prob. Now all the > mailer code can go. You replace 20 lines of code per inset with 20 lines of code per inset. > | Nonsense. We have three frontends now. Anything modified by the > | frontend should be regarded as suspect. As suspect as anything > | coming from the lyxserver. > > I don't agree. shrug. (Happy New Year by the way ;-) -- Angus
