On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Thanks... I stored your answer in the so far very small glossary here: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Glossary > > Historically, mathed and the 'rest' (recently dubbed 'texted') were > really two separate implementations and partially even separate > concepts. Mathed was basically tacked on and not really part of the LyX > core. This remained true even after the mathed rewrite.
I get bad 'vibes' from the word 'texted'... if you verb 'text' and look at the imperfect tempus, you get 'texted', i.e. "wrote". However, I might be confused by Swedish here since, "texta" is a common Swedish verb that means to write each letter separately (when you write by hand). Some spelling alternatives: texted mathed text-ed math-ed textEd mathEd TextEd MathEd How do the natives (English speakers) feel about this? (And I'd also like some opinions on mini-buffer v.s. minibuffer, and lfun v.s. LFUN) > On of the goals of the 1.4 and possibly 1.5 cycle is to merge these two > concepts and implementations. As both implementations had been almost > completely incompatible this means a major overhaul of the LyX core. We > are doing that right now. So far we've finished the removal of most of > the nasty code (refered to as 'the update mess', 'the inset locking (IL) > mess', 'the local cursor mess' etc) and are now busy to build > something sensible from the shards. I thought this was nicely phrased and created this page: http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Goals for discussing/listing development goals. /Christian -- Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr