On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> > Thanks... I stored your answer in the so far very small glossary here:
> >     http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Glossary
> 
> Historically, mathed and the 'rest' (recently dubbed 'texted') were
> really two separate implementations and partially even separate
> concepts. Mathed was basically tacked on and not really part of the LyX
> core. This remained true even after the mathed rewrite.

I get bad 'vibes' from the word 'texted'... if you verb 'text' and look at 
the imperfect tempus, you get 'texted', i.e. "wrote". However, I might be 
confused by Swedish here since, "texta" is a common Swedish verb that 
means to write each letter separately (when you write by hand).

Some spelling alternatives:
        texted          mathed
        text-ed         math-ed
        textEd          mathEd
        TextEd          MathEd

How do the natives (English speakers) feel about this?

(And I'd also like some opinions on mini-buffer v.s. minibuffer, and 
lfun v.s. LFUN)

> On of the goals of the 1.4 and possibly 1.5 cycle is to merge these two
> concepts and implementations. As both implementations had been almost
> completely incompatible this means a major overhaul of the LyX core.  We
> are doing that right now. So far we've finished the removal of most of
> the nasty code (refered to as 'the update mess', 'the inset locking (IL)
> mess', 'the local cursor mess' etc) and are now busy to build
> something sensible from the shards.

I thought this was nicely phrased and created this page:

        http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Devel/Goals

for discussing/listing development goals.

/Christian

-- 
Dr. Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44       http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Reply via email to