Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:08:28AM +0100, Christian Ridderström > wrote: >> Would it make sense to try and assemble descriptions for the lfuns >> as they are in HEAD (possibly context-dependent), in order to get a >> bit closer to a serious scripting interface? > > Not sure. Maybe starting froms scratch would be an option, too. > > I.e. write down a set of functions deemed necessary for a decent > sripting interface (i.e. create a suitable language) and implement > these (of course as far as possible using the existing code). > > I am afraid using the current mess as starting point will give us an > interface full of syntactic and semantic quirks.
Good idea. But not in the 1.4.x cycle please ;-) -- Angus
