> >> And so, I suspect, is André's assertion that the concept is no > >> longer needed. Now that insets are handling there > > > > Naughty boy, Angus, naughty boy :) > > s/there/their/ > > Actually, you're exactly wrong.
I don't think so :) > 'Where is this concept handled? Over there, in the inset::dispatch > function.' > > As opposed to > > 'Now that the insets handle this concept in their dispatch member > functions.' Ekhm, this is not an argument. The two sentences you wrote above are both correct it seems, yet the one that I pointed to is still wrong :) Now that the insets are handling [was: there] THEIR own FuncRequests, THERE is no need ... The first "there" was wrong, the second one is obviously right. It makes no sense to say "Now that the insets are handling there own FuncRequests". It might be mariginally correct, as if you meant to say "Now, the insets are handling there, own ...." but that's really a long stretch. It's a very common mistake that you've made and it doesn't help that in English, one spells things differently yet pronounces them the same. Cheers, Kuba
