On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:47:37PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > What I meant was that in light of the smallness (assuming good > authoring practices) of these style instances -- as rare(-ish) > exceptions to common rules -- the balance of pros and cons looks more > favourable for the insets/objects paradigm. And the paradigm will tend > to support and encourage these good practices. > > Of course it's possible to support semantic styling with ranges too... > heck, you can practice structured programming in assembler if you want > to (only partly tongue-in-cheek ;-)
You're missing your justification of why one is somehow more structured than the other. Feel free to take out the overlapping stuff if you like. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
