On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:57:44PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 08:11:21PM +0100, Michael Schmitt spake thusly: > > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > > I would like to see inline mode for CharStyle insets with a bool > > > option in the .layout file. > > > > Please let us discuss this before you start working on this. My plan is > > to move some code from InsetERT to InsetCollapsable. As a consequence, > > we can support the inline mode also for other inset. But that is all. > > > > It _may_ be useful to declare which inset is allowed to have which > > display mode in the layout files. However, I rather doubt if > > hyper-configurability is a desired goal. In the end, everything is > > configurable but also everything is highly unusable. Do we really need > > new options in the layout files? > > That's precisely why I want it this way. The .layout file is > configurability not seen by the end user. If we want in inset to be > switchable among the three: open/closed/inline, we would need a dialog > to go with it (like insetert).
Just move the ERT dialog to InsetCollapsable. Andre'
