On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 07:43:12PM +0000, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > Emph and Noun are only for LaTeX. For linuxdoc you just have to look > > up the syntax from the DTD, and implement what can be readily > > implemented and will work right. (And yes, it would be nice if some > > of these were common to all backends.) > > Actually it should not matter. But definitively Emph belongs to all of them, > both linuxdoc, docbook and I suspect AGU have emphasis style.
Yes... <emph type="italic">... </emph>. > Noun can be translated to docbook as <phrase role="noun">...</phrase>, and > something related to linuxdoc. ...which will also need support for a 'latexparam' type of parameter for the CharStyle inset. That's the next thing to be added, so it can have the value "role="noun%quot;". > This interchangeability is fundamental in my point of view. It is very useful. Don't expect it to be 100% though. Just like on the LaTeX side, sometimes you'll lose something when converting to another textclass. > -- > José Abílio > - Martin
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
