John Levon wrote: > It was, at least. The bug above is from when the bv argument was removed > from these methods; somebody wasn't quite careful enough in removing > the bv()'s.
Somebody strikes again! Alfredo
John Levon wrote: > It was, at least. The bug above is from when the bv argument was removed > from these methods; somebody wasn't quite careful enough in removing > the bv()'s.
Somebody strikes again! Alfredo