On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:56:46AM +0000, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> Apart from that, it seems to make sense, although it'll be fun to > >> see (perhaps dummy) handlers for the LFUN in the insets. > > > > ? > > Which LFUN? > > Whatever LFUN is passed to the inset stored in Cursor in > this call I guess. I thought that you'd need new handling code in > the insets to make them cursor-aware?
No. On the contrary, all the code not strictly doing LFUN handling in dispatch() (i.e. inset locking & Co) will be removed. The cursor just serves as a means to feed the FuncRequest to the first inset (or the global text) that is able to handle it. So you can think of it as a replacement for inset locking. ( Andre'
