Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> Good.
>>
>> [Note that Angus recently had some problems related to
>> [dynamic_cast...]
>
> What kind of problems? In the practical side, should I apply or
> wait?
Maybe real problems with an old gcc 2.95-ish compiler (Christian's).
Maybe merely problems with the logic of my code. Either way, the
problems should now be resolved. I tidied up the logic but also did
away with dynamic_cast using the mathed solution instead:
class Derived1;
calss Derived2;
class Base {
virtual Derived1 * asDerived1() { return 0; }
virtual Derived2 * asDerived2() { return 0; }
];
class Derived1 {
virtual Derived1 * asDerived1() { return this; }
};
class Derived2 {
virtual Derived2 * asDerived2() { return this; }
};
I think you should keep the dynamic_cast for now, get Christian to
try it out and if it doesn't work for him then change it.
--
Angus
