On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > Another question is what version of LyX the students should work with... > > > it could be frustrating working with the CVS version since it's in a very > > > fluctuating state (e.g. sometimes it doesn't even compile). > > > > Everything else would leave us with the need of forward-porting 50 new > > features. If we stick to 1.3.xcvs we'd end up in the same situation as > > the change tracking patch. Works for some ancient version only. > > > > 1.4.0cvs is stable enough for this kind of work. > > I was thinking more along the lines of giving the students a branch to > work on...
Merging small chunks is _much_ simpler than larger. LyX has a bad history with branches (so far only one successful 'large' merge IIRC) I see no benefit over a regualr 'cvs up'. Andre'
