Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:02:49AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
| ...
>
>> > + if (i + 1 < last) <-- needed to prevent trailing empty row
>> > creation after wide inset
>> > + break; <-- OK.
>> >
>> > This works perfectly on the file José sent me.
>>
>> Why this restriction to i + 1 < last?
>>
>> The original code had an unconditional 'break'.
>
| Yes. And as a result, it sometimes happened that a line break was
| placed after an inset sticking out of the right margin even if it
| (that inset) was the last 'character' of its paragraph... resulting in
| an empty trailing row on-screen appearing to contain a character, but
| actually not containing any belonging to the paragraph. And thus the
| 'silly' warning.
>
| You will find this same test also higher up in the code.
|
>> As John said: Be _very_ careful in this area.
>
| You too ;-)
And there was/is problems in this area so it need(ed) work.
--
Lgb
